| |
In a perfect world, all organisms should live and be
protected within their natural habitat, according to a
conservation policy that is commonly known as "Conservation
in situ" and is based on the creation of protected
areas such as national
parks, natural
parks, nature
reserves, wetlands,
Special
Protection Areas (SPAs), Special
Areas of Conservation (SACs) and other
types of areas.
Where
threatened species are concerned, the “in
situ” actions anticipate the conservation of
viable populations in areas that have to be extensive
enough in order to ensure the survival of a number of
individuals sufficient to represent the genetic variability
of the population. For the conservation of this variability,
which allows the species to be adapted to environmental
changes, the extent of such conservation areas should
be calculated according to the demographic density and
the biological characteristics of the species in nature.
 |
 |
The
survival of species and ecosystems, in the long term,
depends on their liberty to grow and develop under natural
conditions. Photo: exemples of protected areas (left)
arborescent matorral with Juniperus spp. and calcareous
rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation.
(© 2005 Gianni Bacchetta - CCB).
|
However, when the protected areas are surrounded
by territories inappropriate to wildlife, such as territories
with intensive human activities and highly populated areas,
then these areas are comparable to “islands”
and, consequently, they are vulnerable. In order to minimise
the side effects of habitat fragmentation, and thanks to
the knowledge obtained in recent years as regards conservation
ecology and biology, the actions of in situ conservation
have been oriented towards a more detailed and complex organisation
of the areas to be protected. Hence, the first ecological
networks have appeared, a kind of a node system with ecological
corridors, buffer zones and environmental areas of reclassification,
which connect the protected areas to each other in such
a way that the survival of the biological communities and
ecological processes is guaranteed.
| |
|
| |
|
| Left
: schematic example of an «ecological network»;
map of the ecological networks in the Netherlands (Source:.http://www.planeco.org).
|
In Europe, where such concepts usually spread rapidly through
the land planning policies, the first continental network
for in situ conservation, that of “Natura
2000”, has been created as a result of the European
Directive 92/43/CEE, known as the “
Habitats Directive”.
|
| Sources:
Battisti C. (2004) - Frammentazione ambientale, connettivita,
reti ecologiche. Un contributo teorico e metodologico con
particolare riferimento alla fauna selvatica. Provincia di
Roma, Assessorato alle politiche ambientali, agricole e Protezione
civile 248 pp. -
link
Convention on Biological Diversity: Protected Areas - Introduction
- link
Di Dio F. - Come si protegge la diversità biologica:
le Reti ecologiche - link
Life ECOnet - Perché una rete ecologica? - link
APAT - Reti ecologiche - link
APAT - Prima individuazione di parametri utili al benchmarking:
analisi di vitalità delle popolazioni - link
Corpo Forestale dello Stato - Aree Protette - link
IUCN (2003) - Guidelines for Application of IUCN
Red List Criteria at Regional Levels: Version 3.0. - IUCN
Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and
Cambridge, UK. ii + 26 pp. - link |
|