| |
| |
| "ex situ"
versus "in situ" conservation |
Conservation is implemented through a field of various
complex and combined actions. However, the techniques
of "in situ" and "ex situ"
conservation, both essential for the protection of species,
reveal some weak points. In situ conservation, which is
efficient when the number of individuals is sufficiently
high, encounters a major limitation when there are problems
with habitat
fragmentation and subsequent reduction of the population
size; thus, it is insufficient when there is a very limited
number of individuals since, in that case, we face genetic
erosion. On the contrary, in the framework of ex situ
conservation, where there is a lack of interaction between
the individual and the environment, only a part of the
genetic variability of a taxon is preserved.
 |
 |
| Photo
(from the left) : River Park of Alcantara (Sicily),
an example of "in situ" conservation (©
2005 Giovanni Spampinato); example of "ex situ"
conservation (with the kind permission of the Millennium
Seed Bank) |
In order to have the greatest probability of success, the
two techniques should be applied in a synergistic way in
the field and must then be defined in a continuum that could
be summarized as follows:
- protect the habitat where the species can live and reproduce,
through appropriate legislative measures (Parks, Protected
Areas, etc.);
- study the reasons for the regression of the species in
nature and / or those reasons that restrain its spontaneous
reproduction;
- collect seeds or seedlings without damaging the original
population and ex situ cultivate a significant
number of individuals;
- re-introduce the species in its natural habitat, with
all the necessary precautions taken to assure a definitive
implantation. It is only after a close collaboration between
the centres of ex situ conservation and the centres
of in situ experimentation, as anticipated in article
9 of the Convention on Biodiversity, that the expected
results will be obtained.
| |
| |
In
situ vs. ex situ : although most of the centres of "ex
situ" conservation are located in industrialised
countries, those devoted to "in situ" conservation
are dislocated mainly in the tropics (countries under
development). This discordance, which is figured in
the distribution map of the world’s 500 Botanical
Gardens richest in vascular plants, represents a great
opportunity but also an important responsibility, which
is explained in the articles 15-19 of the Convention
on Biodiversity.(15-19).
(source :BIOMAPS
- Biodiversity Mapping for Protection and Sustainable
Use of Natural Resources) |
|
| Sources:
Battisti C. (2004) - Frammentazione ambientale, connettività,
reti ecologiche. Un contributo teorico e metodologico con
particolare riferimento alla fauna selvatica. (Provincia di
Roma, Assessorato alle politiche ambientali, Agricoltura e
Protezione civile) -
link
Giuseppe L. Pesce: LEvoluzione: Deriva genetica ed Effetto
del Fondatore - link
Plant research international - Dynamics of Plant Dispersal
related traits in fragmented European habitats - link
Convention on Biological Diversity:Convention Text - link
Piano Nazionale sulla Biodiversità: 4 - Conservazione
in situ - link
Piano Nazionale sulla Biodiversità: 7 - Conservazione
ex situ - link
Orti Botanici e strategia della conservazione - link |
|